Member Center

Review: \'Hostel\' | Movies & TV blog | Recaps, news, & reviews on film and television
 

Home > Blogs > Movies & TV blog > Archives > 2006 > January > 10 > Entry

Review: ‘Hostel’

Apologies for taking so long to comment on Hostel. Eli Roth’s follow-up to his comparatively light-hearted feature debut, Cabin Fever, begins as a Eurotrip-style teen sex comedy, then makes the most drastic and terrifying tonal shift since Takashi Miike’s Audition. Hostel follows two oversexed Americans and an Icelandic drifter who are backpacking through Europe. As the movie begins, they’re in Amsterdam’s red-light district, getting high and sleeping with prostitutes. They meet another Icelandic guy about their age. He tips them off to a Slovak hostel filled with women. “Because of the war,” he says, all the men are gone, and it will be easy for them to get laid.

Slovakia hasn’t been at war since World War II, but you can’t expect a couple of dumb Americans to know that. I didn’t until I Googled it just now. I also learned that Slovakia is often referred to as the “Country at the Heart of Europe,” although how often and by whom I’m not sure. But I’m getting ahead of myself. The Slovak hostel is, of course, a trap. When they get there, they do indeed meet some beautiful girls who are quite willing to sleep with them. They are also quite willing to split them up, drug them, and hand them over to a sadistic butcher shop where people from around the world come and pay a premium price for the opportunity to torture and kill them.

We don’t get to the butcher shop until at least half the movie is over. What’s waiting for these guys seems to be designed as a surprise. It’s not, because the marketing for the movie is built on the torture premise. Initially I thought that this was a necessary mistake — that the movie should have been marketed as the teen comedy it starts out as, so as to let the horror of the second half have its full impact. Of course, it would be impossible to market Hostel that way. At the severing of the first limb, half the audience would walk out and demand a refund. After all, this place makes Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo look like Disneyland. But what of selling an Asia extreme–style gorefest in which not a single drop of blood is shed until the third or fourth reel?

In Cabin Fever, Roth ragged on the xenophobia of suburban teens, literally infecting them with the strange, unfamiliar world of rural America, and letting it devour them from the outside in. Hostel is less about xenophobia than the capitalistic drive for excess. Its characters are lured into the trap by their insatiable desire for stimulation. They get it through sex and drugs, and the businessmen who come to the hostel will get it by torturing them. They are captured by older versions of themselves. The characters’ insatiable appetite for sex, violence and pornography is a self-destructive one. By selling the movie as a straight horror spectacle, Roth is effectively commenting on the very impulse that drives us to see his movie — the same impulse that drove him to make it.

Permalink | Comments (9) | Categories: Movies

Comments

By Hillary

January 11, 2006 7:41 PM | Link to this

Fair warning: If you have even the mildest bit of a “weak stomach,” DO NOT SEE THIS MOVIE. I quite literally had to keep myself from running out of the theatre to vomit. I supressed gagging several times. I can take a lot of gore. But there are scenes in this that got to me. I’m still shuddering — days later.

By Kyrie

January 12, 2006 8:33 AM | Link to this

I have not seen this film and while I am quite liberal in terms of artistic licence and generally abhor censorship even when the material is vile, I have a problem with the premise of Hostel to begin with. It is a movie about people who are being tortured, and about the people who pay to torture and kill them. Roth may think that his film is a satirical comment on dumb American backpackers (and I have, in my travels, met a lot!) but in general, the type of audience that will enjoy this film is much less sophisticated than the supposed message he claims to be sending. And as a human rights activist I find it disturbing that people are paying to see in detail the depiction of gruesome acts that unfortunately happen in real life. Just ask those who survived torture in Iraq, North Korea, Saudi Arabia - or many other countries. Remember, when you watch torture scenes in a film, someone is actually being subject to that type of torture RIGHT NOW. When someone’s toe is cut off in Roth’s film, a torture victim is having their fingers cut off, or their tongues, or worse, RIGHT NOW. When you see Roth’s protagonists get their Achilles tendons severed and their feet cut off, that is happening to someone in real life RIGHT NOW. And all Roth (and others) can do is turn such sadism into a cash cow. If you want to spend money on something relating to torture, why not donate to Amnesty International or other human rights groups campaigning to stop torture, instead of exploiting human misery to entertain a bunch of filmgoers who should have better sense?

By Jared

January 12, 2006 5:59 PM | Link to this

Worst movie ever!!!

By Ellie

January 13, 2006 11:17 PM | Link to this

Goes down in my book as the worst movie I have ever seen. If one day there is a movie that is worse, well…that will be a sad day because I cannot imagine how the horror genre could sink even further. the movie can only be described as gratuitous. Gratuity can work, I’m not one of those prissies who think sex and violence is categorically unnecessary. In fact I can enjoy it at times. But this movie was just a porn film mixed with a pshycopathic nightmare. do not see it. and don’t let anybody convince you the movie has a deeper meaning or intention. it doesn’t.

By filer

January 14, 2006 4:58 PM | Link to this

Slovakia is called “Country at the Heart of Europe,�, becouse of its geographical location. War in Slovakia? :-) The only Slovakian involved in war are our soldiers in Iraq or Afghanistan.

By me

January 15, 2006 9:27 AM | Link to this

My goodness, dear Americans, your geographical knowledge is much lower then world average. What war in Europe? In Slovakia? Do you actually know where Slovakia is? And has somebody asked slovak people if they like Americans to destroy image of their country? No… and now I must hear all that stuff about what kind of a*s our country is. You’ve made from our country place where only whores, gangs and bloody butchers live. Reality is far far away from this.

By JJ_KK

January 16, 2006 10:24 AM | Link to this

idiotic movie. They film it in czech republic - in a small village. They show a railway station in that czech village and that should be a railway station in slovak capital ? why they didnt go to slovakia, only 300 km from that place ? small dirty kids beg for american money… sure ! omg u cretins ! they exchange no coins in slovak banks ! only banknotes ! Black & white TV in a hostel ! are you normal ? are we in year 1970 ? slovak rock/pop music which is 15 years old… what aboute next movie from NY city which will be filmed in a village somewhere in Mexico ?

By Daniela

February 25, 2006 8:45 AM | Link to this

Hello! I ´m from Slovakia. Film Hostel is absurdity. It isnot true that we have old cars, TV… I don ´t know why a film turn in Cezch Republic when story is in Bratislava,capital of Slovak Republic. I bet that 85% of us don´t know Slovakia located.You don ´t know what are slovak people, mainly slovak girls.. Slovak songs in the film are very popular in Slovakia, mainly their singers. When you want know about Slovakia something write back….

By rodrigo

April 8, 2006 1:04 PM | Link to this

i saw the movie and it was no good, but i like to know the name of the songs, can anyone helpme?
 

Things to do