Member Center

Home > Blogs > Hamilton News and Issues (Skip to blog navigation.)

Hamilton native performs today at Ryan’s Tavern

“Hamilton native David Shaw will perform his own songs and renditions of covers tonight, Dec. 26, at Ryan’s Tavern. He also will unveil several new songs. Joining Shaw for the evening is Tim Meyer, a member of his previous band, The Summit Brothers, who will open the show at 9:30 p.m. Shaw will take the stage at 11 p.m. The night will end with a jam session that will feature other local musicians. Shaw, 25, is a graduate of Hamilton High School who moved to New Orleans about a year-and-a-half ago to pursue a music career.”
Click here for the rest of the story from Contributing Writer Ginny McCabe. To find other things to do this weekend, click here.

Permalink | Comments (0) | Post your comment

Teen calls 911 after stedfather shot through front door

Police were notified of the Dec. 3 shooting on Central Avenue when a teenager inside the house, who referred to the victim, Jeff Freeman, as her stepfather, called 911 and frantically repeated the address several times to the emergency dispatcher.

Dispatcher: “Did they shoot him or not? I need to know.” Caller: “I don’t, I don’t know. I’m… hiding… I don’t know what happened. Please hurry up. I don’t know what happened.”

To read the related story, click here.

To hear the recording, click on the link below.

Permalink | Comments (0) | Post your comment

Hamilton Police Department Annual Report 2007

Last year, Hamilton police saw an increase in robberies, burglaries and rapes, but there were reductions in other major types of crimes. Police officials said there weren’t any significant changes over time in the types of crimes being reported.

Take a look for yourself. Click on the link below for the complete Annual Report 2007, which includes, among other statistics, a five-year analysis of criminal offenses, pie graphs of calls per district and bar graphs that reflect traffic accidents.

Hint: It’s a 52-page document. You can go to pages 43-50 to see the numbers.

Permalink | Comments (0) | Post your comment

Should city employees be required to live within the city?

Mandatory in-city residency has come up in conversations at City Council meetings as part of council’s discussions about employees who live outside the city and drive city-owned vehicles home.

Ohio law forbids cities from making mandatory residency requirements, but the Ohio Supreme Court will be hearing oral arguments on Jan. 20, 2009, in Lima vs. State of Ohio, a case that addresses the issue.

Hamilton City Law Director Hillary Stevenson is advising that the city await the Supreme Court’s decision on the case before any action is taken on the part of City Council.

Permalink | Comments (3) | Post your comment

State of the City Address

The following are excerpts from the speeches made by City Manager Mark Brandenburger and Mayor Don Ryan during the State of the City Address.

In some instances, Brandenburger and Ryan improvised or otherwise changed what they wrote down to say, so the words may differ from what was heard today during the Red Carpet Luncheon.

City Manager Mark Brandenburger “Probably everyone is acutely aware of the financial problems governments at all levels are having, and Hamilton’s general fund is experiencing some of the same.

Keep in mind that the general fund is the only pot of money that city government is allowed to use to pay for general city services. These include police protection, fire fighting, paramedic response, parks and recreation, health department nurses and building code compliance.

And, the general fund has also helped pay for public works engineers, not to mention subsidizing road paving and street projects.

Paying for all these employees and the services they provide Hamilton consumes 77 percent of the general fund. More than 60 percent of that is just for police and fire.

City government in Ohio cannot use utility funds to pay for these services. The law does not allow t his — with one exception I’ll talk about later.

So where does the general fund get its money? Here are the three biggies, and they are all tax monies: $19 million, local income tax; $3 million, property taxes; $2.5 million, state of Ohio shared revenue.

With City Council’s approval early this year, shortly after our finance director resigned to go work for another city, we retained a national accounting firm.

Why?

We wanted that firm to take an independent outside look at Hamilton’s financial situation.

We asked them to forecast what the City’s general fund expenditures and revenues both would look like over the next five years.

That forecast was completed in May and shared with everyone.

It warned that Hamilton’s general fund balance would be $1.2 million at the end of 2008 and negative $4 million at the end of 2009 — Unless we started to take action then and there to either increase revenues, decrease expenditures or both.

According to finance professionals, Hamilton’s general fund year-end carry-over balance should be 5 to 15 percent of the budget.

A bare bones minimum would be at least $2.5 million, not $1.2 million, and certainly not negative $4 million.

With City Council’s blessing, this summer we implemented — effective immediately — a 2008 budget cut plan for the entire city, including hiring freezes and expenditure reductions to help preserve general fund monies and avoid layoffs.

And, that has helped a lot — to a degree.

Allow me to explain.

We are still in the process of preparing a 2009 budget — for the general fund and all other funds for that matter.

For this 2009 budget, we’ve given general fund departments specific monetary targets that they must reach, and department heads are attempting to reduce expenditures to meet those 2009 targets.

But, even with a budget of zero growth, the general fund budget won’t balance.

In order to balance it for 2009, we will still need to save more in 2008, to cut staff in 2009 or increase revenues in 2009.

That’s because even with all we’ve done this summer with hiring freezes and expense reductions, it’s just not enough.

So, what are we doing?

First, city employees as a whole in all departments and divisions, including our nine labor unions, are looking at health care savings through our health benefits committee.

The committee has looked at changes on health care to reduce the city’s cost.

The national accounting firm projected that cost to increase 6.7 percent.

Hamilton’s health care provider just announced 12.2 percent increases in cost for next year.

But, through plan changes recommended by the committee, that overall cost increase for health care has been whittled down to 2.3 percent instead of 12.2 percent and instead of the 6.7 percent projected by the national accounting firm.

And, additional initiatives also recommended by the committee have the potential to push the 2.3 percent figure even lower.

Second, you’ve all heard or read about the state kilowatt hour tax, and that would increase general fund revenues by $2.6 million per year if council were to enact it in full.

The kilowatt hour tax shows on the electric portion of your city utility bill now.

But, Hamilton City Council has credited it from your bill ever since that tax was authorized by the state of Ohio eight years ago.

So, the tax shows on your but it also shows as a credit that’s taken off your bill by City Council.

That means you’ve never paid the extra amount that Hamilton could charge as a tax on electricity.

By state law, those tax proceeds would go to the city’s general fund.

All other cities that have electric operations charge this tax.

All investor owned utilities, such as Duke, already have this kind of charge embedded in their electric rates.

All electric customers residing outside the city limits have to pay this tax because state law says so, and their payments must be sent by Hamilton to the Ohio state treasury.

We heard at an electric conference yesterday in Columbus that the state of Ohio is looking under every rock for more money for its general fund.

Some fellow attendees, people who are pretty savvy about statehouse matters in Columbus, expressed the fear that any city that hasn’t already enacted the kilowatt hour tax to support its own general fund, and Hamilton has not, may be required in the future by state law to enact the tax and send it to the state to help the state’s general fund.

Wouldn’t that be a kick in the city’s pants?

Don’t get me wrong. Whether or not city council chooses to adopt the kilowatt hour tax a little at a time, all at once, or not at all remains only a discussion item.”

Mayor Don Ryan “There’s eight weeks left to approve a balanced budget for 2009 and it’s going to be extremely difficult for council to determine how to make up a million dollar shortage.

We’ve been discussing the budget for six months and we’ve knocked it down from $2.5 million to $1 million deficit. Our cost of doing business next year will out pace our revenue.

Some of City Council, including me, are against implementing the 6 percent kilowatt hour tax and passing our burden onto the citizens and businesses.

Most cities in the United States are facing this same budget crisis so it’s not that Hamilton is or has done anything wrong. The national economy is what it is, and council’s job is to deal with it in the most equitable way possible.”

Permalink | Comments (0) | Post your comment

Red light cameras coming to Hamilton

City officials are entering contract negotiations with Redflex Traffic Systems to install red light cameras at various city intersections. The Scottsdale, Ariz. firm will be conducting a traffic study at 11 relatively dangerous intersections in the city. City Council will have a final say on whether or not to go forward with the cameras. Such systems have proven to reduce crashes, but there have been legal challenges in Ohio focused on their implementation and if they violate the state constitution by making traffic violations a civil matter and not criminal. Girard, a town near Youngstown, was ordered to stop using traffic enforcement cameras after a judge ruled that the program was unconstitutional. Another legal battle out of Toledo raised the issue that no police officer was present to witness the traffic violation. Below is the list of city intersections that are being considered where cameras could be installed.

Permalink | Comments (3) | Post your comment

Hamilton police seeking donations for cruiser cameras

Hamilton City Manager Mark Brandenburger has sent letters to the Molyneaux Foundation and the James M. Cox Foundation asking for $15,000 from each organization to help pay for video cameras to be installed in Hamilton police cruisers. Money had been set aside for the purchases, but the funds were reallocated because of the city’s recent budget cuts. The additional dollars, if granted, would be added to $80,000 that’s come from seven contributors in the community. The Flashback Digital Video System would wirelessly upload onto the Hamilton Police Department’s server. Brandenburger wrote that the cameras would provide the following benefits to the city: • Protects the community if an officer does something wrong • Protects the officers against false accusations • Provides a tamper-proof chain of evidence, freeing up officers’ time to gather evidence. Cameras have become standard equipment for cruisers in many police jurisdictions. I’ll be asking city leaders why cameras weren’t purchased before the city found itself in a budget crunch.

Permalink | Comments (2) | Post your comment

Back to top

More entries...